Peer Benchmarks

Hiring cost is mostly invisible because it lands as overtime, slipped schedules and turned-down work rather than as a line item. Ninety-day retention is the number that separates a hiring problem from an onboarding problem, and they need completely different fixes.

Recruiting and Retention, against operators like you.

How hard it is to hire and how well the hires stick: days to fill an open role, offer acceptance rate, applicants per requisition, and retention at ninety days and one year.

What Gets Measured

5 benchmarks on this dimension.

Time to Fill

Offer Acceptance

Applicants / Req

90-Day Retention

1-Year Retention

Each one is read against operators filtered to your size, service mix, and region, so the comparison is to businesses like yours rather than the industry averaged into mush.

Where You Land

You will not know the gap until you can see it beside someone comparable.

YouOperators like you
Members

Recruiting and Retention

We'll show you exactly where you land, the moment you're in.

Become a member

Where It Comes From

Job postings and applicant records, offer and start dates, and payroll. Verinode reads what those systems already produce. There is no form to fill in and nothing to migrate, and every connection is read-only: Verinode never writes back into a system you own.

When It Appears

A peer line on this dimension does not appear until enough distinct operators have contributed to it. That is deliberate: a benchmark built on a handful of businesses is not a benchmark, and a thin cohort cannot protect anyone’s anonymity. You will see fewer numbers early, and the ones you see are honest. These are operational figures rather than competitively sensitive ones, so they stay current.

Common Questions

Questions on this benchmark.

What does Verinode benchmark under recruiting and retention?

5 metrics: Time to Fill, Offer Acceptance, Applicants / Req, 90-Day Retention, 1-Year Retention. Each is compared against operators filtered to your size, service mix, and region rather than the industry as a whole, so the peer line reflects businesses actually like yours.

Where does Verinode get the data for these benchmarks?

Job postings and applicant records, offer and start dates, and payroll. Verinode reads what those systems already produce, so there is nothing to migrate and no form to retype your business into. Every connection is read-only, including accounting: Verinode never writes back into a system you own, and every document processed returns a receipt showing exactly what was read.

How many operators are behind a number like this?

Enough that it is honest, or it is not shown at all. No statistic publishes until a minimum number of distinct operators have contributed to it, one operator counts once regardless of size, and medians and interquartile ranges are used rather than averages so no single business can move a line. Early on that means you will see fewer benchmarks, which is the intended trade: a peer figure built on a handful of businesses is not a benchmark and cannot protect anyone's anonymity. The full statistical treatment is published at verinode.ai/methodology.

Are these figures current, and is sharing them lawful?

These are operational figures rather than competitively sensitive ones, so they stay current instead of carrying the 90-day lag applied to prices, costs, margins, and wages. Verinode is a neutral administrator throughout: operators contribute to Verinode rather than to each other, no operator sees another's raw data, and only anonymized aggregates are published. The full reasoning is at verinode.ai/fair-benchmarking.

Why Operators Join

The number only means something beside someone comparable.

Your own figures you can already pull. What you cannot pull is where they sit against operators your size running the same work, and that is the part that tells you whether to act.